Предложения по правилам

17:10 | 17 августа 2017
Proposals / Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation Forms Current issues : It looks as if the judges of different panels (D1/D2 and D3/D4) remain very focused on analyzing of what is happening on the carpet rather than actually being able to see the element and write it down. The proposal is to add very simple looking forms that the judge would be able to follow in a simple way and write the evaluation of an element on that form. It appears that the judge works more efficient during the routine when she/he is not focused entirely on the routine without knowing what to expect next (BD, R, S or AD) but when she/he is aware of what at least SHOULD be coming next. FORM EXAMPLE :

Brief explanation : The coach writes down only succession of elements The judge evaluates only what she/he sees on the carpet but is somehow ready to what she should expect in this or that part of the exercise Gives the judges an understanding when they should expect to see an AD during S or BD during R. The judges may see the BD of 0.10 value already in the sheet and add their value if necessary. Judge may write some symbols in the respective cell and then the score if element was evaluated in the respective cell (in yellow) No need for the judges to spend lots of time trying to figure out the symbols on the sheet – it’s very simple, they will just know what they expect to see and will have at least some additional seconds to evaluate the element correctly S — dance step sequences Current issues : S are very much what reflects the Artistic component of the exercise Due to the current overuse of walkovers in AD as part of S, the Artistic component is somehow lost in the exercise and no time for the gymnasts to squeeze in. Disbalanced value. S costs 0.30 and lasts 8 seconds. AD costs 0.30 and lasts 1 second. Coaches choose an easy way to rather have 8 “false AD” rather than 1 S Solution : NO AD (at least with elements with rotation) in S Increase the minimum requirements to S to 2 dance step sequences instead of 1. AD — Apparatus difficulty Current issues : Gymnasts currently overuse pre-acrobatic elements for AD Very vague understanding of AD scoring (too many elements in the routine, the judges get lost in evaluation and necessity to make immediate decision when the elements are going one after another) AD unlike BD is unlimited, takes less time than R or S. As a consequence, the coaches overuse AD or “false AD” to increase the D score of the exercise. Proposals in terms of this : Solution : NO to AD with the use of pre-acrobatic elements and elements with rotation in S (unevitably leads to abruption of S). Limit of AD to 5 elements per routine (the coaches will then choose the most visible and attractive elements that will be understood and evaluated by the judges and appreaciated by the audience) R Current issues : The major problems of routine evaluation are connected with the necessity of immediate reaction for R evaluating. That is getting too confusing for the judges and needs to be simplified Catching “in rotation” brings double value, overused by gymnasts and not appreciated by the audience – the definition needs to be changed. Solution : NO to AD with the use of pre-acrobatic elements and elements with rotation in S (unevitably leads to abruption of S). Limit of AD to 5 elements per routine (the coaches will then choose the most visible and attractive elements that will be understood and evaluated by the judges and appreaciated by the audience)  Proposals : Rotations around vertical axis : 0.10 each Rotations around horizontal axis : 0.20 each

Meaning the minimum R may cost :

2 chaine : 0.10+0.10 = 0.20 2 rolls : 0.20+0.20 = 0.40 1 chaine+1 roll : 0.10+0.20 = 0.30

Eliminate this criteria (below).  This criteria is quite confusing to count immediately during R and if we use the type of evaluation above it would be easier for the judges to evaluate the R

Either eliminate or change the wording for this criteria (below) . Proposed wording : “Catch DURING a rotation in case the catch is performed outside visual field and without hands”.

Add the possibility of performing leaps with rotation (like jete en tournant or any other leap with rotation of at least 360 degrees) UNDER the flight of apparatus and be evaluated by the BD.

Нужен видео пример.

Бросок – жете ан турнан, пересед, ловля.

Бросок – жете подбивной прогнувшись, пересед, ловля

http://ukraine-rg.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/R020.mp4
Источник
Художественная гимнастика 19:20 | 01 ноября 2021 Чемпіонат світу в Японії: результати п’ятого дня змагань Художественная гимнастика 11:50 | 31 октября 2021 Чемпіонат світу в Японії: результати четвертого дня змагань Художественная гимнастика 21:35 | 29 октября 2021 Чемпіонат світу в Японії: результат третього дня змагань Художественная гимнастика 16:35 | 28 октября 2021 Чемпіонат світу в Японії: результати другого дня змагань Художественная гимнастика 21:50 | 27 октября 2021 Чемпіонат світу в Японії: результати першого дня змагань Художественная гимнастика 20:20 | 17 октября 2021 Вікторія Онопрієнко виборола три медалі у фіналах Гран-Прі в Іспанії Художественная гимнастика 22:35 | 16 октября 2021 Вікторія Онопрієнко — срібна призерка Гран-Прі в Іспанії Художественная гимнастика 21:20 | 02 сентября 2021 «Кубок Дерюгіної 2021» скасовано Художественная гимнастика 23:50 | 08 августа 2021 Українські груповички — сьомі на Олімпіаді Художественная гимнастика 22:35 | 07 августа 2021 Результати другого дня змагань на Олімпіаді: груповички пройшли у фінал, а Погранична і Онопрієнко замкнули 10-ку кращих гімнасток

Художественная гимнастика

08 августа 2021

07 августа 2021

07 августа 2021

Художественная гимнастика
Булавы
Финал
10 сентября 2015

Художественная гимнастика
Лента
Финал
10 сентября 2015

Художественная гимнастика
Мяч
Финал
08 сентября 2015

Художественная гимнастика
Обруч
Финал
08 сентября 2015
Финал
23 сентября 2014

Художественная гимнастика
Мяч
Финал
23 сентября 2014

Художественная гимнастика
10 булав
Финал
01 сентября 2013